The science behind CarbonCloud
CarbonCloud is based on a biophysical model that has been developed during more than 20 years of scientific endeavors. The model can calculate climate footprints quickly and with a high degree of accuracy.
Climate-curious or sustainability expert?
Pick your own adventure and explore the science behind (and inside) CarbonCloud
Meet our science team
Life Cycle Analyst, PhD
Xueting Wang
Xueting Wang is a life cycle analyst at CarbonCloud. She accomplished her Ph.D. degree in material science on sustainable chemical production in 2018. Her research and passion are rooted in sustainable development of our society since then. At CarbonCloud, Xueting engages both in life cycle analysis and product development. With the knowledge from a substantial amount of analysis done, she applies her experience in providing a data-driven solution to assessing the climate performance of the food industry at scale.
VP of Science, PhD
Erik Edlund
Erik Edlund is VP of Science at CarbonCloud, leading the Science team in creating, curating, and delivering the scientific knowledge the food industry needs to tackle climate change. Erik is a former MIT Postdoc Fellow with a Ph.D. in Complex Systems from Chalmers. His Ph.D. thesis, Exactly Solvable Models for Self-Assembly, used methods from Statistical Mechanics to design self-assembling soft matter systems. At CarbonCloud his research has included estimating climate impacts of agricultural products and method development for ensuring correctness and efficiency in the design and implementation of scientific models.
Scientist, PhD
Emma Jonson
Emma Jonson has a Ph.D. in Energy and Environment and has been working for almost 4 years at CarbonCloud. During her doctoral studies, she deepened her knowledge of climate change physics, energy systems, and the climate impact on agriculture. Her skills include locating, structuring, and analyzing information from these fields, e.g. with the help of mathematical models. At CarbonCloud she uses her scientific knowledge and skills to assess, in a consistent and efficient way, the climate impact from the different life cycle stages of food products.
Co-founder, Science Advisor, PhD, Professor – Advisory Board
Fredrik Hedenus
Fredrik Hedenus is an associate professor at Physical Resource Theory with a focus on food, energy, and climate change mitigation at Chalmers University of Technology and co-founder of CarbonCloud. He has conducted research about the future energy system for 15 years and is co-author of the book Sustainable Development – nuances and perspectives. Fredrik is a thought leader on food and climate change in Sweden with a track record of TV productions and a large number of radio and newspaper appearances.
Newsletter to-go?
Our special today is our Newsletter, including snackable tips, hearty climate knowledge, and digestible industry news delivered to your inbox
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
What you measure is climate footprint and the unit with which you measure it is kg CO₂e, or only kg CO₂ if all the emissions are carbon dioxide (CO₂). Think about it as you would with length, where what you measure is the length and the unit you measure it with is a meter. If it makes grammatical sense to write length you write climate footprint and if it makes grammatical sense to write meter then you write kg CO₂e.
There are many different greenhouse gases of which carbon dioxide is the most widely known. Different greenhouse gases affect the climate in different ways. Some stay in the atmosphere for a long time but do not cause so much warming per kg emissions, like carbon dioxide. Others, like methane, heat the earth a lot, but do not stay very long in the atmosphere. There is an exchange rate of sorts, that makes the comparison of the different gases possible. The exchange rate expresses how many kg of carbon dioxide emissions that warm the climate equally as 1 kg of another greenhouse gas. The exchange rate is called Global Warming Potential and is typically abbreviated GWP. By knowing the GWP of different gases the total climate impact of a product can be condensed into one single unit: kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents (kg CO₂e).
WHAT'S IN A FOOTPRINT?
Dive deep into climate science
What are Scope 1,2,3 emissions?
The terms Scope 1,2,3 emissions are casually thrown around in the sustainability space – a bit too casually if you ask us. If you didn’t Google it the first time you heard
Sustainability Standards Explained: CSRD
Emissions disclosures are becoming mandatory in 35 nations and markets representing 56% of the global GDP but there is one market that has been causing quite a stir. The European U
Sustainability Standards Explained: TCFD
The Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Recommendations is the shadow ruler of ESG reporting. While the name “TCFD” may not ring a bell to everyone, the
Sustainability Standards Explained: SBTi
SBTi is the Pete Davidson of Sustainability Standards: rapidly and consistently up-and-coming, charming and approachable, a must-have for aspirational influencers, and fresh in the
Sustainability Standards Explained: ISO 14000 family
Nothing says Standards like the International Organization for Standardization, also known to the business community as ISO. ISO is a popular and globally credible provider of stan
Sustainability Standards Explained: GHG protocol
Food and beverage producers, retailers, you and we at CarbonCloud have the same headache: There is currently no universally agreed-upon standard for sustainability. There isn’t a
How do deforestation emissions work in food?
Deforestation is one of those topics that, as actionable and measurable as it is, transcends business and numbers. For most of us, images of thinning forests, the faded shades of g
We saw 0kg of CO2e: The case of Two Raccoons, fruit surplus, and allocating emissions
Two Raccoons are winemakers with a purpose… or rather, winemakers who give a purpose. Two Raccoons makes delicious wines from good fruit surplus which otherwise would go to waste
Calculating the climate footprint of packaging
From time to time, we get questions about our emission factors for packaging material. Sometimes they differ from the emission factors found elsewhere, for methodological reasons.